Labouring in the Shadow of the British Political Tradition: The Dilemma of ‘One Nation’ Politics in an Age of Disunification

Patrick Diamond, Roger Liddle, David Richards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The British state is in flux and the Labour party is struggling to shape an effective response to the politics of disunification. This article reflects on the nature of Labour's governing project and its conception of modern statecraft which has evolved since the party became a serious contender for power in the aftermath of the First World War. We argue that Labour's initially pluralising instincts cultivated in opposition have been checked by the ongoing reality of a state-centric mode of governing, in which the party continued to robustly defend the Westminster model operating within the parameters established by the British Political Tradition (BPT). Ed Miliband's conception of ‘One Nation’ Labour threatens to reinforce this historical pattern of reversion to the Westminster model, at precisely the moment when devolutionary forces are destabilising the existing political settlement. To break out of this impasse, Labour must look elsewhere in its ideological lexicon for inspiration, chiefly to the tradition of socialist pluralism and associationalism.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)52-61
Number of pages9
JournalThe Political Quarterly
Volume86
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Apr 2015

Keywords

  • British political tradition;New Labour;One Nation;devolution;constitutional reform
  • New Labour
  • One Nation
  • Devolution
  • Constitutional reform

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Labouring in the Shadow of the British Political Tradition: The Dilemma of ‘One Nation’ Politics in an Age of Disunification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this