Abstract
The British state is in flux and the Labour party is struggling to shape an effective response to the politics of disunification. This article reflects on the nature of Labour's governing project and its conception of modern statecraft which has evolved since the party became a serious contender for power in the aftermath of the First World War. We argue that Labour's initially pluralising instincts cultivated in opposition have been checked by the ongoing reality of a state-centric mode of governing, in which the party continued to robustly defend the Westminster model operating within the parameters established by the British Political Tradition (BPT). Ed Miliband's conception of ‘One Nation’ Labour threatens to reinforce this historical pattern of reversion to the Westminster model, at precisely the moment when devolutionary forces are destabilising the existing political settlement. To break out of this impasse, Labour must look elsewhere in its ideological lexicon for inspiration, chiefly to the tradition of socialist pluralism and associationalism.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 52-61 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | The Political Quarterly |
Volume | 86 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 13 Apr 2015 |
Keywords
- British political tradition;New Labour;One Nation;devolution;constitutional reform
- New Labour
- One Nation
- Devolution
- Constitutional reform