Abstract
The English term “aphasia” denotes language disorders after cerebro-vascular incidents and due to neurodegenerative diseases. In a comparison of both forms of language disorders, we aim to demonstrate that this broad terminus is well-grounded. The review article is based on a selective literature search. As a result, differences in onset and course of disease, aetiology, pattern of brain damage and characteristic concomitant symptoms indeed speak in favour of a notional distinction. However, there is a noteworthy overlap in brain mechanisms and damage localisation. Moreover, the analogies in language symptoms and accompanying impairments are high and significant for speech therapy. The commonalities justify the broadly phrased term “aphasia” for both types of impairment –the 2 types of disease and the clinical features should nevertheless be properly separated. Therefore we suggest a notional distinction between vascular and dementia-related/progressive aphasia (German terms). Implications for language treatment of progressive aphasia are presented.
| Translated title of the contribution | Language disorders after stroke and due to dementia: How crucial are the differences for speech therapy? |
|---|---|
| Original language | German |
| Pages (from-to) | 86-91 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Sprache - Stimme - Gehoer |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- aphasia
- stroke
- dementia
- aphasia therapy
- brain processing
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Language disorders after stroke and due to dementia: How crucial are the differences for speech therapy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver