Abstract
This article highlights the individual merits and weaknesses of laparoscopic as compared with open surgery as the primary treatment of colorectal cancer. Although results clearly suggest that laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer results in an earlier postoperative recovery, it is more difficult to comment on rarer complications. To date, results from laparoscopic colorectal resections suggest that the resected specimen is oncologically comparable that obtained with open surgery, but more long-term data on cancer recurrence and survival at 3 and 5 years postoperatively are eagerly awaited.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 519-531 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Surgical oncology clinics of North America |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2008 |
Keywords
- Colorectal Neoplasms/economics
- Europe
- Evidence-Based Medicine
- Humans
- Laparoscopy/adverse effects
- Postoperative Complications/etiology
- Postoperative Period
- Time Factors
- United Kingdom/epidemiology
Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre