Law and public administration: Convergence and symbiosis

Anthony Bertelli, Carol Harlow

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

In the light of historical tensions, this article considers some classical administrative law responses to changing techniques of public administration. Rejecting the customary reproach that law is unresponsive to the needs of public administrators, the article nonetheless identifies a widespread conviction that control and accountability are the primary objectives of administrative law. The response of administrators overwhelmed by procedural requirements is to fall back on 'soft law' techniques. The article notes the growing use of 'soft law' and recourse to 'soft' techniques of governance in the European Union, together with a possible convergence of legal and administrative values, as standards of 'good governance' and 'principles of good administration' acceptable to both sides are promulgated and enforced by courts. As 'good governance' standards are disseminated by international and transnational institutions, the article predicts a similar pattern of tension and evasion, as procedurally oriented administrative law systems enforced by transnational adjudicative organs develop to occupy the global administrative space. Copyright © 2005 IIAS, SAGE Publications.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInternational Review of Administrative Sciences|Int. Rev. Adm. Sci.
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages279-294
Number of pages15
Volume71
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2005

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Law and public administration: Convergence and symbiosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this