@article{2d86309d88604c63878140172dcc3ef9,
title = "Lay intuitions about epistemic normativity",
abstract = "Recent empirical work on non-philosophers{\textquoteright} intuitions about epistemic normativity reveals patterns that cannot be fully accounted for by direct epistemic consequentialism. On the basis of these results, one might picture participants as “epistemic deontologists.” We present the results of two new experiments that support a more nuanced picture. We examine intuitions about guesses and hypotheses, and about beliefs. Our results suggest a two-factor model of intuitions, wherein both consequentialist and non-consequentialist considerations affect participants{\textquoteright} judgments about epistemic permissibility.",
keywords = "Epistemic Normativity, Epistemic Permissibility, Deontic Theory, Epistemic Act, Epistemic Acceptability, Philosophy, Epistemology, Experimental Philosophy, Experimental epistemology, Epistemic Consequentialism, Epistemic Deontology",
author = "Pendaran Roberts and James Andow and Schmidtke, {Kelly Ann}",
year = "2017",
month = mar,
day = "29",
doi = "10.1007/s11229-017-1371-6",
language = "English",
volume = "195",
pages = "3267--3287",
journal = "Synthese",
issn = "0039-7857",
publisher = "Springer Nature",
number = "7",
}