Legitimate Expectation of Consistent Interpretation of EU State Aid Law: Recovery in State Aid Cases Involving Advanced Pricing Agreements on Tax

Liza Lovdahl Gormsen, Clement Mifsud-Bonnici

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    788 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    • This paper examines whether the recovery obligations
    in the recent tax cases are acceptable in the light
    of the general principles of EU law on legal certainty,
    legitimate expectations and proportionality.
    • It argues that the Commission’s order of recovery
    in the tax cases is highly questionable.
    • The Commission’s expansive interpretation of State
    aid prohibition was not foreseeable and its retrospective
    recovery of the State aid is arbitrary and
    goes against the principle of legal certainty.
    • It concludes that in the Commission could have
    used other means of dealing with advanced pricing
    agreements on tax to provide clarity and respect the
    principle of proportionality.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-14
    Number of pages14
    JournalJournal of European Competition Law & Practice
    Volume8
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 24 Apr 2017

    Keywords

    • State aid, tax, legitimate expectations, legal certainty

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Legitimate Expectation of Consistent Interpretation of EU State Aid Law: Recovery in State Aid Cases Involving Advanced Pricing Agreements on Tax'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this