Abstract
This article examines a specific technology, the germ-free "isolator," tracing its development across three sites: (1) the laboratory for the production of standard laboratory animals, (2) agriculture for the efficient production of farm animals, and (3) the hospital for the control and prevention of cross-infection and the protection of individuals from infection. Germ-free technology traveled across the laboratory sciences, clinical and veterinary medicine, and industry, yet failed to become institutionalized outside the laboratory. That germ-free technology worked was not at issue. Working, however, was not enough. Examining the history of a technology that failed to find widespread application reveals the labor involved in aligning cultural, societal, and material factors necessary for successful medical innovation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 237-275 |
| Number of pages | 38 |
| Journal | Bulletin of the History of Medicine |
| Volume | 86 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Keywords
- Bioethics
- Bubble boy
- Cross-infection
- Gnotobiotics
- Laboratory animal
- LOBUND