Lifestyle interventions for knee pain in overweight and obese adults aged ≥45: Economic evaluation of randomised controlled trial

Garry R. Barton, Tracey H. Sach, Claire Jenkinson, Michael Doherty, Anthony J. Avery, Kenneth R. Muir

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Objective: To estimate the cost effectiveness of four different lifestyle interventions for knee pain. Design: Cost utility analysis of randomised controlled trial. Setting: Five general practices in the United Kingdom. Participants: 389 adults aged ≥45 with self reported knee pain and body mass index (BMI) ≥28. Interventions: Dietary intervention plus quadriceps strengthening exercises, dietary intervention, quadriceps strengthening exercises, and leaflet provision. Participants received home visits over a two year period. Main outcome measure: Incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained over two years from a health service perspective. Results: Advice leaflet was associated with a mean change in cost of -£31, and a mean QALY gain of 0.085. Both strengthening exercises and dietary intervention were more effective (0.090 and 0.133 mean QALY gain, respectively) but were not cost effective. Dietary intervention plus strengthening exercises had a mean cost of £647 and a mean QALY gain of 0.147 and was estimated to have an incremental cost of £10 469 per QALY gain (relative to leaflet provision), and a 23.1% probability of being cost effective at a £20 000/QALY threshold. Conclusion: Dietary intervention plus strengthening exercises was estimated to be cost effective for individuals with knee pain, but with a large level of uncertainty. Trial registration: ISRCTN93206785.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)610-612
    Number of pages2
    JournalBmj
    Volume339
    Issue number7721
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 12 Sept 2009

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Lifestyle interventions for knee pain in overweight and obese adults aged ≥45: Economic evaluation of randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this