TY - JOUR
T1 - Likelihood of reporting adverse events in community pharmacy: An experimental study
AU - Ashcroft, D. M.
AU - Morecroft, C.
AU - Parker, D.
AU - Noyce, P. R.
PY - 2006/2
Y1 - 2006/2
N2 - Background: In the UK the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) is designed to coordinate the reporting of patient safety incidents nationally and to improve the ability of the health service to learn from the analysis of these events. Little is known about levels of engagement with the NRLS. Objective: To examine the likelihood of community pharmacists and support staff reporting patient safety incidents which occur in community pharmacies. Methods: Questionnaire survey containing nine incident scenarios. In the scenarios two factors were orthogonally manipulated: the outcome for the patient was reported as good, bad or poor, and the behaviour of the pharmacist was described as either complying with a protocol, not being aware of a protocol (error), or violating a protocol. Respondents were asked to rate whether they would report the incident (1) locally within the pharmacy and (2) nationally to the National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA). Results: 275 questionnaires were returned (79% response rate) from 223 community pharmacists and 52 members of support staff. There were significant main effects for both patient outcome (F(2,520) = 18.19, p
AB - Background: In the UK the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) is designed to coordinate the reporting of patient safety incidents nationally and to improve the ability of the health service to learn from the analysis of these events. Little is known about levels of engagement with the NRLS. Objective: To examine the likelihood of community pharmacists and support staff reporting patient safety incidents which occur in community pharmacies. Methods: Questionnaire survey containing nine incident scenarios. In the scenarios two factors were orthogonally manipulated: the outcome for the patient was reported as good, bad or poor, and the behaviour of the pharmacist was described as either complying with a protocol, not being aware of a protocol (error), or violating a protocol. Respondents were asked to rate whether they would report the incident (1) locally within the pharmacy and (2) nationally to the National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA). Results: 275 questionnaires were returned (79% response rate) from 223 community pharmacists and 52 members of support staff. There were significant main effects for both patient outcome (F(2,520) = 18.19, p
U2 - 10.1136/qshc.2005.014639
DO - 10.1136/qshc.2005.014639
M3 - Article
SN - 1475-3898
VL - 15
SP - 48
EP - 52
JO - Quality and Safety in Health Care
JF - Quality and Safety in Health Care
IS - 1
ER -