Linking rights, needs and fairness in high-stakes assessments and examinations

Kevin Woods, Tamsin Linehan-Mccaldin, Amanda Hipkiss, Beverley Tyrrell, Megan Dawes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

79 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper presents a novel explanation for the continued absence of a children’s rights strategy within high-stakes educational assessment with reference to the competing purposes of high-stakes assessments and group-based constructions of fairness in assessment. We provide an original critique of group-based perspectives on the validity of assessment accommodations whic supports an individual perspective on fair educational assessment. From this, the (almost forgotten) concept of ‘student assessment needs’ is (re-)introduced as a central axiom, to be constructed through feedback from, and dialogue with, students about their experience of high-stakes assessments, giving primacy to their purpose as an attainment demonstration opportunity for the student. To promote a new movement towards student participation in educational assessment processes and reforms, we propose ‘rights respecting assessment’, complementary to UNICEF’s ‘Rights Respecting Schools’ initiative, in which regular system-wide student representation would contribute to the development of high-stakes examination systems. In recognition of this aspiration, this paper is co-authored with a recent school-leaving age examination candidate.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)86-101
Number of pages16
JournalOxford Review of Education
Volume45
Issue number1
Early online date30 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jul 2018

Keywords

  • educational assessment
  • children’s rights
  • fairness
  • Assessment needs
  • high-stakes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Linking rights, needs and fairness in high-stakes assessments and examinations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this