TY - JOUR
T1 - Living with fragile infrastructure: The gendered labour of preventing, responding to and being impacted by sanitation failures
AU - Alda-Vidal, Cecilia
AU - Lawhon, Mary
AU - Iossifova, Deljana
AU - Browne, Alison L
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank participants in the study for their willingness to share their time and personal experiences. We are thankful to our field assistants Mr Charles Mkula, Ms Emmie Ngosi and Ms Diana Nkomba. This study is part of the PhD project of the first author, funded by the Sustainable Consumption Institute at the University of Manchester (PhD Studentship) and supervised by Alison Browne (main supervisor) and Deljana Iossifova (co-supervisor). The paper was further developed and refined through in a postdoc mentorship with Mary Lawhon funded by The Riksbankens Jubileumsfond (RJ) for work conducted under the project ‘‘Examining nature society relations through urban infrastructure’’ (project number: P19-0286:1) https://www.kth.se/nature. Cecilia would like to thank her PhD examiners Saska Petrova and Antje Bruns for their deep engagement with, and insightful feedback on her thesis and to the members of the Political Ecology Remote Collective for their comments to an earlier version of the manuscript. We thank the reviewers for their inspiring and encouraging feedback.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/3/28
Y1 - 2023/3/28
N2 - While infrastructure is often understood to operate ‘in the background’, scholars have increasingly attended to the labour that enables urban material flows. Drawing on empirical material collected through fieldwork and document analysis in Lilongwe, this paper explores how different residents of the city experience and respond to the regular failures of infrastructure. We examine sanitation in one middle- and two low-income areas, considering the contamination of drinking water and the collapse of latrines. Attending to the gendered, embodied, affective, and intimate dimensions of maintenance and repair labours, we develop three interrelated arguments. First, we frame incidents of failure not as individual accidents but as part of persistently fragile infrastructures. Second, we contribute to extending the gaze of infrastructural labours beyond manual work and ‘expert’ knowledge to consider a range of unpaid practices and their role in preventing, responding to, and being impacted by failure. Finally, we show that both the labour and impacts of infrastructural failure disproportionally fall on (low-income) women. Emphasising the ongoing, gendered struggles of keeping sanitation infrastructures functional helps us to see the limits of scholarship that centres clearly identifiable jobs associated with infrastructure’s construction, maintenance and repair. We conclude with reflections on the implications of these arguments for our understanding of the knowledges and labours that keep infrastructures working, and the conditions in which these are performed.
AB - While infrastructure is often understood to operate ‘in the background’, scholars have increasingly attended to the labour that enables urban material flows. Drawing on empirical material collected through fieldwork and document analysis in Lilongwe, this paper explores how different residents of the city experience and respond to the regular failures of infrastructure. We examine sanitation in one middle- and two low-income areas, considering the contamination of drinking water and the collapse of latrines. Attending to the gendered, embodied, affective, and intimate dimensions of maintenance and repair labours, we develop three interrelated arguments. First, we frame incidents of failure not as individual accidents but as part of persistently fragile infrastructures. Second, we contribute to extending the gaze of infrastructural labours beyond manual work and ‘expert’ knowledge to consider a range of unpaid practices and their role in preventing, responding to, and being impacted by failure. Finally, we show that both the labour and impacts of infrastructural failure disproportionally fall on (low-income) women. Emphasising the ongoing, gendered struggles of keeping sanitation infrastructures functional helps us to see the limits of scholarship that centres clearly identifiable jobs associated with infrastructure’s construction, maintenance and repair. We conclude with reflections on the implications of these arguments for our understanding of the knowledges and labours that keep infrastructures working, and the conditions in which these are performed.
KW - Everyday practices
KW - Gender
KW - Infrastructure
KW - Maintenance and repair
KW - Sanitation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85151476838&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/c8a2e733-460b-3d13-bc1f-a5567486fea7/
U2 - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103724
DO - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103724
M3 - Article
SN - 0016-7185
VL - 141
JO - Geoforum
JF - Geoforum
M1 - 103724
ER -