TY - JOUR
T1 - Longitudinal predictors of subjective recovery in psychosis
AU - Law, H.
AU - Shryane, N.
AU - Bentall, R. P.
AU - Morrison, A. P.
PY - 2015/11/19
Y1 - 2015/11/19
N2 - Background: Research has highlighted the importance of recovery as defined by the service user, and suggests a link to negative emotion, although little is known about the role of negative emotion in predicting subjective recovery. Aims: To investigate longitudinal predictors of variability in recovery scores with a focus on the role of negative emotion. Method: Participants (n=110) with experience of psychosis completed measures of psychiatric symptoms, social functioning, subjective recovery, depression, hopelessness and selfesteem at baseline and 6 months later. Path analysis was used to examine predictive factors for recovery and negative emotion. Results: Subjective recovery scores were predicted by negative emotion, positive self-esteem and hopelessness, and to a lesser extent by symptoms and functioning. Current recovery score was not predicted by past recovery score after accounting for past symptoms, current hopelessness and current positive self-esteem. Conclusions: Psychosocial factors and negative emotion appear to be the strongest longitudinal predictors of variation in subjective recovery, rather than psychiatric symptoms.
AB - Background: Research has highlighted the importance of recovery as defined by the service user, and suggests a link to negative emotion, although little is known about the role of negative emotion in predicting subjective recovery. Aims: To investigate longitudinal predictors of variability in recovery scores with a focus on the role of negative emotion. Method: Participants (n=110) with experience of psychosis completed measures of psychiatric symptoms, social functioning, subjective recovery, depression, hopelessness and selfesteem at baseline and 6 months later. Path analysis was used to examine predictive factors for recovery and negative emotion. Results: Subjective recovery scores were predicted by negative emotion, positive self-esteem and hopelessness, and to a lesser extent by symptoms and functioning. Current recovery score was not predicted by past recovery score after accounting for past symptoms, current hopelessness and current positive self-esteem. Conclusions: Psychosocial factors and negative emotion appear to be the strongest longitudinal predictors of variation in subjective recovery, rather than psychiatric symptoms.
U2 - 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.158428
DO - 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.158428
M3 - Article
C2 - 26585094
SN - 1472-1465
VL - 209
SP - 48
EP - 53
JO - British Journal of Psychiatry
JF - British Journal of Psychiatry
IS - 1
ER -