TY - JOUR
T1 - Longitudinal realist evaluation of the Dementia PersonAlised Care Team (D-PACT) intervention
T2 - protocol
AU - Wheat, Hannah
AU - Weston, Lauren
AU - Oh, Tomasina M.
AU - Morgan-Trimmer, Sarah
AU - Ingram, Wendy
AU - Griffiths, Sarah
AU - Sheaff, Rod
AU - Clarkson, Paul
AU - Medina-Lara, Antonieta
AU - Musicha, Crispin
AU - Spicer, Stuart
AU - Ukoumunne, Obioha
AU - Allgar, Victoria
AU - Creanor, Siobhan
AU - Clark, Michael
AU - Quinn, Cath
AU - Gude, Alex
AU - McCabe, Rose
AU - Batool, Saqba
AU - Smith, Lorna
AU - Richards, Debra
AU - Shafi, Hannah
AU - Warwick, Bethany
AU - Lasrado, Reena
AU - Hussain, Basharat
AU - Jones, Hannah
AU - Dalkin, Sonia
AU - Bate, Angela
AU - Sherriff, Ian
AU - Robinson, Louise
AU - Byng, Richard
N1 - Funding Information:
The 5-year D-PACT programme is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research to address these knowledge gaps. It has developed, and is about to evaluate, an intervention for people with dementia and carers that provides ongoing post-diagnostic support in the form of a DSW, embedded within primary care.
Funding Information:
The D-PACT project is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). The project reference is RP-PG-0217-20004. It is also supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula (PenARC) — Hannah Wheat and Tomasina M Oh are currently funded by an NIHR PenARC fellowship grant, and Richard Bing’s and Obioha Ukoumunne’s time is supported through PenARC funding. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or PenARC.
Publisher Copyright:
© This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
PY - 2023/9/19
Y1 - 2023/9/19
N2 - Background: Different dementia support roles exist but evidence is lacking on which aspects are best, for whom, and in what circumstances, and on their associated costs and benefits. Phase 1 of the Dementia PersonAlised Care Team programme (D-PACT) developed a post-diagnostic primary care-based intervention for people with dementia and their carers and assessed the feasibility of a trial. Aim: Phase 2 of the programme aims to 1) refine the programme theory on how, when, and for whom the intervention works; and 2) evaluate its value and impact. Design & setting: A realist longitudinal mixed-methods evaluation will be conducted in urban, rural, and coastal areas across South West and North West England where low-income or ethnic minority populations (for example, South Asian) are represented. Design was informed by patient, public, and professional stakeholder input and phase 1 findings. Method: High-volume qualitative and quantitative data will be collected longitudinally from people with dementia, carers, and practitioners. Analyses will comprise the following: 1) realist longitudinal case studies; 2) conversation analysis of recorded interactions; 3) statistical analyses of outcome and experience questionnaires; 4a) health economic analysis examining costs of delivery; and 4b) realist economic analysis of high-cost events and ‘near misses’. All findings will be synthesised using a joint display table, evidence appraisal tool, triangulation, and stakeholder co-analysis. Conclusion: The realist evaluation will describe how, why, and for whom the intervention does or does not lead to change over time. It will also demonstrate how a non-randomised design can be more appropriate for complex interventions with similar questions or populations.
AB - Background: Different dementia support roles exist but evidence is lacking on which aspects are best, for whom, and in what circumstances, and on their associated costs and benefits. Phase 1 of the Dementia PersonAlised Care Team programme (D-PACT) developed a post-diagnostic primary care-based intervention for people with dementia and their carers and assessed the feasibility of a trial. Aim: Phase 2 of the programme aims to 1) refine the programme theory on how, when, and for whom the intervention works; and 2) evaluate its value and impact. Design & setting: A realist longitudinal mixed-methods evaluation will be conducted in urban, rural, and coastal areas across South West and North West England where low-income or ethnic minority populations (for example, South Asian) are represented. Design was informed by patient, public, and professional stakeholder input and phase 1 findings. Method: High-volume qualitative and quantitative data will be collected longitudinally from people with dementia, carers, and practitioners. Analyses will comprise the following: 1) realist longitudinal case studies; 2) conversation analysis of recorded interactions; 3) statistical analyses of outcome and experience questionnaires; 4a) health economic analysis examining costs of delivery; and 4b) realist economic analysis of high-cost events and ‘near misses’. All findings will be synthesised using a joint display table, evidence appraisal tool, triangulation, and stakeholder co-analysis. Conclusion: The realist evaluation will describe how, why, and for whom the intervention does or does not lead to change over time. It will also demonstrate how a non-randomised design can be more appropriate for complex interventions with similar questions or populations.
KW - caregivers
KW - dementia
KW - personalised care
KW - primary health care
KW - realist evaluation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85172191195&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0019
DO - 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0019
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85172191195
SN - 2398-3795
VL - 7
JO - BJGP Open
JF - BJGP Open
IS - 3
ER -