Lordly Management and its Discontents: ‘Human Resource Management’ in Pakistan

Syed Imran Saqib, Matthew MC Allen, Geoffrey Wood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


New institutionalism increasingly informs work on comparative human resource management (HRM), downplaying power and how competing logics play out, and potentially providing an incomplete explanation of how and why ‘HRM’ and associated practices vary in different national contexts. We examine HRM in Pakistan’s banking industry and assess how managers’ espoused views of HRM practices reflect prevailing ones in dominant HRM models, and how they differ from early-career professionals’ perceptions of these practices. The cultural script of ‘seth’ (a neo-feudalist construction of authority) influences managers’ implementation of HRM policies and competes with the espoused HRM logic. We argue that managers will pursue a ‘seth’ logic when managing employees, as it reproduces existing power differentials within companies. By doing so, they render HRM unrecognizable from dominant models. Indeed, by using the term ‘HRM’, much of the existing, new institutionalism-influenced literature rationalizes a particular view of organizations and management that is inappropriate and analytically misleading in emerging economies.

Original languageEnglish
JournalWork, Employment and Society
Publication statusPublished - 10 Apr 2021


  • HRM
  • Pakistan
  • culture
  • institutional logics
  • neo-feudalism
  • new institutionalism


Dive into the research topics of 'Lordly Management and its Discontents: ‘Human Resource Management’ in Pakistan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this