Lupus community panel proposals for optimising clinical trials: 2018

Joan T Merrill, Susan Manzi, Cynthia Aranow, Anca Askenase, Ian Bruce, Eliza Chakravarty, Ben Chong, Karen Costenbader, Maria Dall'Era, Ellen Ginzler, Leslie Hanrahan, Ken Kalunian, Joseph Merola, Sandra Raymond, Brad Rovin, Amit Saxena, Victoria P Werth

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Formidable impediments stand in the way of treatment development for lupus. These include the unwieldy size of current trials, international competition for scarce patients, complex outcome measures and a poor understanding of these outcomes in the world at large. The heterogeneity of the disease itself coupled to superimposition of variegated background polypharmacy has created enough immunological noise to virtually ensure the failure of lupus treatment trials, leaving an understandable suspicion that at least some of the results in testing failed drugs over the years may not have been negative, but merely uninterpretable. The authors have consulted with many clinical trial investigators, biopharmaceutical developers and stakeholders from government and voluntary sectors. This paper examines the available evidence that supports workable trial designs and proposes approaches to improve the odds of completing interpretable treatment development programs for lupus.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e000258
JournalLupus Science & Medicine
Volume5
Issue number1
Early online date23 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Journal Article
  • Review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lupus community panel proposals for optimising clinical trials: 2018'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this