TY - JOUR
T1 - Machine-learning Support to Individual Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Multimodal MRI and Cognitive Assessments
AU - De Marco, Matteo
AU - Beltrachini, Leandro
AU - Biancardi, Alberto
AU - Frangi, Alejandro F.
AU - Venneri, Annalena
N1 - Funding Information:
Received for publication February 13, 2017; accepted July 3, 2017. From the Departments of *Neuroscience; †Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Centre for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine (CISTIB); ∥Cardiovascular Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield; ‡School of Physics and Astron-omy; and §School of Psychology, Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. Supported by grant no. 42/RF-2010-2321718 from the Italian Ministry of Health to A.V. M.D.M. and A.B. were employed through funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under grant agreement no. 601055, VPH-DARE@IT to A.V. and A.F.F. This study was also partially sup-ported by EPSRC, grant number, EP/M006328/1, OCEAN, to A.F.F. and A.V. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Reprints: Annalena Venneri, PhD, Department of Neuroscience, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, N floor, Room N130, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK (e-mail: [email protected]). Copyright © 2017 The Autho r(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Background: Understanding whether the cognitive profile of a patient indicates mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or performance levels within normality is often a clinical challenge. The use of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (RS-fMRI) and machine learning may represent valid aids in clinical settings for the identification of MCI patients. Methods: Machine-learning models were computed to test the classificatory accuracy of cognitive, volumetric [structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI)] and blood oxygen level dependentconnectivity (extracted from RS-fMRI) features, in single-modality and mixed classifiers. Results: The best and most significant classifier was the RS-fMRI +Cognitive mixed classifier (94% accuracy), whereas the worst performing was the sMRI classifier (~80%). The mixed global (sMRI+RS-fMRI+Cognitive) had a slightly lower accuracy (~90%), although not statistically different from the mixed RSfMRI+ Cognitive classifier. The most important cognitive features were indices of declarative memory and semantic processing. The crucial volumetric feature was the hippocampus. The RS-fMRI features selected by the algorithms were heavily based on the connectivity of mediotemporal, left temporal, and other neocortical regions. Conclusion: Feature selection was profoundly driven by statistical independence. Some features showed no between-group differences, or showed a trend in either direction. This indicates that clinically relevant brain alterations typical of MCI might be subtle and not inferable from group analysis.
AB - Background: Understanding whether the cognitive profile of a patient indicates mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or performance levels within normality is often a clinical challenge. The use of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (RS-fMRI) and machine learning may represent valid aids in clinical settings for the identification of MCI patients. Methods: Machine-learning models were computed to test the classificatory accuracy of cognitive, volumetric [structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI)] and blood oxygen level dependentconnectivity (extracted from RS-fMRI) features, in single-modality and mixed classifiers. Results: The best and most significant classifier was the RS-fMRI +Cognitive mixed classifier (94% accuracy), whereas the worst performing was the sMRI classifier (~80%). The mixed global (sMRI+RS-fMRI+Cognitive) had a slightly lower accuracy (~90%), although not statistically different from the mixed RSfMRI+ Cognitive classifier. The most important cognitive features were indices of declarative memory and semantic processing. The crucial volumetric feature was the hippocampus. The RS-fMRI features selected by the algorithms were heavily based on the connectivity of mediotemporal, left temporal, and other neocortical regions. Conclusion: Feature selection was profoundly driven by statistical independence. Some features showed no between-group differences, or showed a trend in either direction. This indicates that clinically relevant brain alterations typical of MCI might be subtle and not inferable from group analysis.
KW - hippocampus
KW - machine learning
KW - magnetic resonance imaging
KW - resting-state
KW - semantics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036639914&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000208
DO - 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000208
M3 - Article
C2 - 28891818
AN - SCOPUS:85036639914
SN - 0893-0341
VL - 31
SP - 278
EP - 286
JO - Alzheimer disease and associated disorders
JF - Alzheimer disease and associated disorders
IS - 4
ER -