Abstract
The UK regulatory requirements relating to going-concern disclosures require directors to report on the going-concern status of their firms. Such directors have incentives not to report fairly in the case of financially-distressed firms. We expect effective corporate governance mechanisms will encourage directors to report more truthfully in such situations. This paper tests this proposition explicitly using a large sample of going-concern cases over the period 1994-2000. We find that whereas auditors' going-concern opinions predict the subsequent resolution of going-concern uncertainties directors' going-concern statements convey arbitrary and unhelpful messages to users. However, robust corporate governance structures and high auditor reputation constrain directors to be more truthful in their going-concern disclosures, bringing these more into line with the more credible auditor opinions. © 2006 The Authors Journal compilation © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 789-816 |
Number of pages | 27 |
Journal | European Financial Management |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 5 |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2006 |
Keywords
- Cadbury disclosure
- Corporate governance
- Financial distress
- Going concern