Management going-concern disclosures: Impact of corporate governance and auditor reputation

Jinn Yang Uang, David B. Citron, Sudi Sudarsanam, Richard J. Taffler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The UK regulatory requirements relating to going-concern disclosures require directors to report on the going-concern status of their firms. Such directors have incentives not to report fairly in the case of financially-distressed firms. We expect effective corporate governance mechanisms will encourage directors to report more truthfully in such situations. This paper tests this proposition explicitly using a large sample of going-concern cases over the period 1994-2000. We find that whereas auditors' going-concern opinions predict the subsequent resolution of going-concern uncertainties directors' going-concern statements convey arbitrary and unhelpful messages to users. However, robust corporate governance structures and high auditor reputation constrain directors to be more truthful in their going-concern disclosures, bringing these more into line with the more credible auditor opinions. © 2006 The Authors Journal compilation © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)789-816
Number of pages27
JournalEuropean Financial Management
Volume12
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2006

Keywords

  • Cadbury disclosure
  • Corporate governance
  • Financial distress
  • Going concern

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Management going-concern disclosures: Impact of corporate governance and auditor reputation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this