Abstract
I defend Christopher Peacocke's and Robert Hopkins's experienced resemblance accounts of depiction against criticisms put forward by Gavin McIntosh in a recent article in this journal. I argue that, while there may be reasons for rejecting Peacocke's and Hopkins's accounts, McIntosh fails to provide any. © British Society of Aesthetics 2005.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 64-68 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | British Journal of Aesthetics |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'McIntosh's unrealistic picture of Peacocke and Hopkins on realistic pictures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver