TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring glitch recoveries and braking indices with Bayesian model selection
AU - Liu, Y
AU - Keith, M J
AU - Antonopoulou, D
AU - Weltevrede, P
AU - Shaw, B
AU - Stappers, B W
AU - Lyne, A G
AU - Mickaliger, M B
AU - Basu, A
PY - 2024/7/2
Y1 - 2024/7/2
N2 - For a selection of 35 pulsars with large spin-up glitches ( & Delta;ν/ν ≥ 10
-6), which are monitored by the Jodrell Bank Observatory, we analyse 157 glitches and their recoveries. All parameters are measured consistently and we choose the best model to describe the post-glitch recovery based on Bayesian evidence. We present updated glitch epochs, sizes, changes of spin down rate, exponentially recovering components (amplitude and corresponding time-scale) when present, as well as pulsars' second frequency derivatives and their glitch-associated changes if detected. We discuss the different observed styles of post-glitch recovery as well as some particularly interesting sources. Several correlations are revealed between glitch parameters and pulsar spin parameters, including a very strong correlation between a pulsar's interglitch |ν¨| and ν˙, as well as between the glitch-induced spin-down rate change Δν˙
p that does not relax exponentially and ν˙. We find that the ratio | & Delta;ν˙
p/ν¨| can be used as an estimate of glitch recurrence times, especially for those pulsars for which there are indications of a characteristic glitch size and interglitch waiting time. We calculate the interglitch braking index n and find that pulsars with large glitches typically have n greater than 3, suggesting that internal torques dominate the rotational evolution between glitches. The external torque, for example, from electromagnetic dipole radiation, could dominate the observed ν¨ for the youngest pulsars (≲10
4 yr), which may be expected to display n ∼ 3.
AB - For a selection of 35 pulsars with large spin-up glitches ( & Delta;ν/ν ≥ 10
-6), which are monitored by the Jodrell Bank Observatory, we analyse 157 glitches and their recoveries. All parameters are measured consistently and we choose the best model to describe the post-glitch recovery based on Bayesian evidence. We present updated glitch epochs, sizes, changes of spin down rate, exponentially recovering components (amplitude and corresponding time-scale) when present, as well as pulsars' second frequency derivatives and their glitch-associated changes if detected. We discuss the different observed styles of post-glitch recovery as well as some particularly interesting sources. Several correlations are revealed between glitch parameters and pulsar spin parameters, including a very strong correlation between a pulsar's interglitch |ν¨| and ν˙, as well as between the glitch-induced spin-down rate change Δν˙
p that does not relax exponentially and ν˙. We find that the ratio | & Delta;ν˙
p/ν¨| can be used as an estimate of glitch recurrence times, especially for those pulsars for which there are indications of a characteristic glitch size and interglitch waiting time. We calculate the interglitch braking index n and find that pulsars with large glitches typically have n greater than 3, suggesting that internal torques dominate the rotational evolution between glitches. The external torque, for example, from electromagnetic dipole radiation, could dominate the observed ν¨ for the youngest pulsars (≲10
4 yr), which may be expected to display n ∼ 3.
KW - methods: data analysis
KW - methods: statistical
KW - pulsars: general
KW - stars: neutron
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85197652271&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/mnras/stae1499
DO - 10.1093/mnras/stae1499
M3 - Article
SN - 1365-2966
VL - 532
SP - 859
EP - 882
JO - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
JF - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
IS - 1
ER -