Abstract
There is now a sustained interest in measuring geographical variation in social and economic circumstances in order to guide urban policy resource allocation decisions. The most recent attempt to measure local area deprivation in England has come through the government's Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). The authors aim to consider the degree to which the IMD provides a reliable mechanism for doing so and to suggest the ways in which its successors might best be refined. They argue that although the IMD, in many respects, represents a commendable advance in terms of the development of techniques to quantify deprivation, there remain significant limitations that future approaches could profitably address.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 883-903 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Environment & Planning C: Government & Policy |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2003 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring neighbourhood deprivation: A critique of the Index of Multiple Deprivation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Impacts
-
Deprivation Indices and Urban Regeneration Policy
Robson, B. (Participant) & Bradford, M. (Participant)
Impact: Environmental impacts, Economic impacts, Societal impacts
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver