Mechanisms for size-dependent protein segregation at immune synapses assessed with molecular rulers

Juha Matti Alakoskela, Apurba L. Koner, Dominika Rudnicka, Karsten Köhler, Mark Howarth, Daniel M. Davis

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    Immunological synapses are specialized intercellular contacts formed by several types of immune cells in contact with target cells or antigen-presenting cells. A late-stage immune synapse is commonly a bulls-eye pattern of immune cell receptor-ligand pairs surrounded by integrin complexes. Based on crystal structures, the intermembrane distance would be ∼15 nm for many immune cell receptor-ligand pairs, but ∼40 nm for integrin-ligand pairs. Close proximity of these two classes of intermembrane bonds would require significant membrane bending and such proteins can segregate according to their size, which may be key for receptor triggering. However, tools available to evaluate the intermembrane organization of the synapse are limited. Here, we present what we believe to be a novel approach to test the importance of size in the intercellular organization of proteins, using live-cell microscopy of a size-series of fluorescently-labeled molecules and quantum dots to act as molecular rulers. Small particles readily colocalized at the synapse with MHC class I bound to its cognate natural killer cell receptor, whereas particles larger than 15 nm were increasingly segregated from this interaction. Combined with modeling of the partitioning of the particles by scaled-particle adsorption theory, these molecular rulers show how membrane-bending elasticity can drive size-dependent exclusion of proteins within immune synapses. © 2011 by the Biophysical Society.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2865-2874
    Number of pages9
    Issue number12
    Publication statusPublished - 2011


    Dive into the research topics of 'Mechanisms for size-dependent protein segregation at immune synapses assessed with molecular rulers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this