Mechanisms of brief contact interventions in clinical populations: A systematic review

Allison Milner*, Matthew J. Spittal, Nav Kapur, Katrina Witt, Jane Pirkis, Greg Carter

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Background: Brief Contact Interventions (BCIs) have been of increasing interest to suicide prevention clinicians, researchers and policy makers. However, there has been no systematic assessment into the mechanisms underpinning BCIs. The aim of the current paper is to provide a systematic review of the proposed mechanisms underpinning BCIs across trial studies. Method: A systematic review was conducted of trials using BCIs (post-discharge telephone contacts; emergency or crisis cards; and postcard or letter contacts) for suicide or self-harm. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the reference lists of all past reviews in the area. Secondary searches of reference lists were undertaken. Results: Sixteen papers provided a description of possible mechanisms which we grouped into three main areas: social support; suicide prevention literacy, and; learning alternative coping behaviours. After assessment of the studies and considering the plausibility of mechanisms, we suggest social support and improved suicide prevention literacy are the most likely mechanisms underpinning BCIs. Conclusion: Researchers need to better articulate and measure the mechanisms they believe underpin BCIs in trial studies. Understanding more about the mechanisms of BCIs' will inform the development of future interventions for self-harm and suicide.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number194
    JournalBMC Psychiatry
    Volume16
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 8 Jun 2016

    Keywords

    • Brief contact interventions
    • Emergency department
    • Help seeking
    • Letters
    • Phone calls
    • Postcard
    • Self-harm
    • Social support
    • Suicide

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Mechanisms of brief contact interventions in clinical populations: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this