TY - JOUR
T1 - Metal FFF sintering shrinkage rate measurements by X-ray computed tomography
AU - Léonard, Fabien
AU - Tammas-Williams, Samuel
N1 - Funding Information:
STW would like to acknowledge the help of the Henry Moseley Facility from Manchester for the scanning of the samples during the COVID 19 worldwide pandemic. FL would like to acknowledge the fruitful discussions with Dr Erwan Plougonven from the Université de Lièges regarding the autocorrelation function. The authors acknowledge funding from Liverpool John Moores University to manufacture the samples and fund XCT access.
Funding Information:
STW would like to acknowledge the help of the Henry Moseley Facility from Manchester for the scanning of the samples during the COVID 19 worldwide pandemic. FL would like to acknowledge the fruitful discussions with Dr Erwan Plougonven from the Université de Lièges regarding the autocorrelation function. The authors acknowledge funding from Liverpool John Moores University to manufacture the samples and fund XCT access.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022/9/3
Y1 - 2022/9/3
N2 - Fused filament fabrication (FFF), also known under the brand name fused deposition modelling, has recently emerged as a more straightforward and economic alternative to established 3D printing or additive manufacturing technologies such as powder bed fusion for metal part manufacturing. In this work, we report on possible approaches to the measurements of FFF sintering shrinkage rates from X-ray computed tomography (XCT) data, with particular focus on those that use greyscale data, and are thus independent of any errors introduced by segmentation. Metallic parts were produced using FFF technology, which relies on an isotropic scaling factor applied to the STL model of the part to be produced to compensate for the shrinkage happening during the sintering of the printed (green) part. We report that for the stainless-steel parts produced, the shrinkage rates were not isotropic and the one along the build direction was the largest, the other two being similar to one another. Overall, the shrinkage rate measured by the different methodologies all fell between 15 % and 16 %. XCT data also clearly showed the typical defects encountered with this technology, such as voids resulting from insufficient overlap or caused by print head blockages, are not mitigated by the sintering process. Autocorrelation was introduced as a way of characterising the 3D structure of the sample before and after sintering, and thus the sintering shrinkage rates.
AB - Fused filament fabrication (FFF), also known under the brand name fused deposition modelling, has recently emerged as a more straightforward and economic alternative to established 3D printing or additive manufacturing technologies such as powder bed fusion for metal part manufacturing. In this work, we report on possible approaches to the measurements of FFF sintering shrinkage rates from X-ray computed tomography (XCT) data, with particular focus on those that use greyscale data, and are thus independent of any errors introduced by segmentation. Metallic parts were produced using FFF technology, which relies on an isotropic scaling factor applied to the STL model of the part to be produced to compensate for the shrinkage happening during the sintering of the printed (green) part. We report that for the stainless-steel parts produced, the shrinkage rates were not isotropic and the one along the build direction was the largest, the other two being similar to one another. Overall, the shrinkage rate measured by the different methodologies all fell between 15 % and 16 %. XCT data also clearly showed the typical defects encountered with this technology, such as voids resulting from insufficient overlap or caused by print head blockages, are not mitigated by the sintering process. Autocorrelation was introduced as a way of characterising the 3D structure of the sample before and after sintering, and thus the sintering shrinkage rates.
KW - Fused filament fabrication
KW - SSR
KW - autocorrelation
KW - fused deposition modelling
U2 - 10.1080/10589759.2022.2085702
DO - 10.1080/10589759.2022.2085702
M3 - Article
VL - 37
SP - 631
EP - 644
JO - Nondestructive testing and evaluation
JF - Nondestructive testing and evaluation
SN - 1058-9759
IS - 5
ER -