Minimum numbers of fresh whole blood and plasma samples from patients and healthy subjects for ISI calibration of CoaguChek and RapidPointCoag monitors

Leon Poller, Michelle Keown, Nikhil Chauhan, Anton M H P Van den Besselaar, Armando Tripodi, Jorgen Jespersen, Caroline Shiach

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The international sensitivity index (ISI) calibration of point-of-care-test (POCT) prothrombin time (PT) whole blood monitors is complex, requiring manual PT testing of 60 patients' and 20 healthy subjects' plasma samples. The possibility of reducing these numbers was studied by a Monte Carlo Bootstrap study for 2 POCT PT systems. For reduced sample numbers, this consisted of 50, 000 calibrations using whole blood and plasma samples tested on the monitors with manual PT testing of plasma samples from the same blood donations. There was little effect on mean ISI by reduction of sample numbers to a total of 7, but there was progressively less certainty regarding the reliability of the calibration. Precision of the calibrations and international normalized ratio deviation were not affected markedly by reducing numbers to half. As ISI calibration with the 2 POCT systems was less precise than conventional manual testing, for maximum confidence, reduction of numbers is not advised.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)892-899
    Number of pages7
    JournalAmerican journal of clinical pathology
    Volume117
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2002

    Keywords

    • Fresh plasma
    • INR
    • International normalized ratio
    • International sensitivity index
    • ISI calibration
    • Minimum numbers
    • POCT PT monitors
    • Point-of-care testing
    • Prothrombin time
    • PT
    • Whole blood

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Minimum numbers of fresh whole blood and plasma samples from patients and healthy subjects for ISI calibration of CoaguChek and RapidPointCoag monitors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this