Abstract
Inspired by Latour's aim to restore balance to the anthropological project by exoticizing the artefacts and procedures of so-called ‘modern knowledge’, this essay gives an ethnographic description of emergent processes of knowledge production in the context of the planning and development of urban regeneration in London. Bureaucratic meetings are described as part of the organizational infrastructure that enables the crafting of new urban futures, and it is argued that, because the making of reality is always seen to be forward moving, there is a need, as in navigation, to plot a course. The essay focuses on the subversive potential of informal meetings, and argues, more generally, that meetings are the materially social, and affectively technical, manoeuvres that make possible direction-finding and contestation about the way forward.
Procès
Procès
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 124 |
| Number of pages | 137 |
| Journal | Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 16 Mar 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 10 Apr 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- Meetings
- Bureaucracy
- Olympics
- Regeneration
- Allotments
- Urban
- London
- Mega-Project
- Planning
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Minutes, meetings, and ‘modes of existence. Navigating the bureaucratic process of urban regeneration in East London.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver