Mixed-methods research in pharmacy practice: recommendations for quality reporting (part 2)

MA Hadi, DP Alldred, SJ Closs, M Briggs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This is the second of two papers that explore the use of mixed-methods research in pharmacy practice. This paper discusses the rationale, applications, limitations and challenges of conducting mixed-methods research. As with other research methods, the choice of mixed-methods should always be justified because not all research questions require a mixed-methods approach. Mixed-methods research is particularly suitable when one dataset may be inadequate in answering the research question, an explanation of initial results is required, generalizability of qualitative findings is desired or broader and deeper understanding of a research problem is necessary. Mixed-methods research has its own challenges and limitations, which should be considered carefully while designing the study. There is a need to improve the quality of reporting of mixed-methods research. A framework for reporting mixed-methods research is proposed, for researchers and reviewers, with the intention of improving its quality. Pharmacy practice research can benefit from research that uses both 'numbers' (quantitative) and 'words' (qualitative) to develop a strong evidence base to support pharmacy-led services.
Original languageUndefined
Pages (from-to)96-100
Number of pages5
JournalInt J Pharm Pract
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2014

Keywords

  • evidence-based practice
  • mixed-methods
  • pharmacy practice
  • research method

Cite this