Modelling treatment-effect heterogeneity in randomized controlled trials of complex interventions (Psychological treatments)

Graham Dunn, Richard Bentall

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    We describe instrumental variable (IV) methods for the estimation of the 'dose'-response effects of psychological interventions in randomized controlled trials in which there is variability in the patients' adherence to the allocated therapy (that is, variability in the actual number of sessions of therapy attended) and also variability in the strength of the therapeutic alliance between patients and their therapists. The effect of the therapy on outcome is assumed to be a function of both the number of sessions attended and the strength of the therapeutic alliance, with no intervention effects in the absence of any sessions attended (an exclusion restriction) and the effect of the strength of the alliance being represented by a multiplicative term (interaction) in the treatment-effect model. The IV methods that are described allow for: (a) hidden confounding between sessions, alliance and outcome; (b) measurement errors in the alliance; and (c) that alliance is only measured in those receiving treatment. Diree two-stage estimation procedures are illustrated, and their equivalence demonstrated, through Monte Carlo simulation and analysis of the results of an actual trial. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)4719-4745
    Number of pages26
    JournalStatistics in medicine
    Volume26
    Issue number26
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 20 Nov 2007

    Keywords

    • Complex intervention
    • Effect modification
    • Hidden confounding
    • Instrumental variable
    • Mediation
    • Psychological treatment effects
    • Selection effects
    • Treatment-effect heterogeneity

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Modelling treatment-effect heterogeneity in randomized controlled trials of complex interventions (Psychological treatments)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this