Money or mental health: The cost of alleviating psychological distress with monetary compensation versus psychological therapy

Christopher J. Boyce, Alex M. Wood

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Money is the default way in which intangible losses, such as pain and suffering, are currently valued and compensated in law courts. Economists have suggested that subjective well-being regressions can be used to guide compensation payouts for psychological distress following traumatic life events. We bring together studies from law, economic, psychology and medical journals to show that alleviating psychological distress through psychological therapy could be at least 32 times more cost effective than financial compensation. This result is not only important for law courts but has important implications for public health. Mental health is deteriorating across the world - improvements to mental health care might be a more efficient way to increase the health and happiness of our nations than pure income growth. Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)509-516
    Number of pages7
    JournalHealth Economics, Policy and Law
    Volume5
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Money or mental health: The cost of alleviating psychological distress with monetary compensation versus psychological therapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this