Abstract
This paper evaluates the accuracy of 1-month-ahead systematic (beta) risk forecasts in three return measurement settings; monthly, daily and 30 minutes. It was found that the popular Fama–MacBeth beta from 5 years of monthly returns generates the most accurate beta forecast among estimators based on monthly returns. A realized beta estimator from daily returns over the prior year generates the most accurate beta forecast among estimators based on daily returns. A realized beta estimator from 30-minute returns over the prior 2 months generates the most accurate beta forecast among estimators based on 30-minute returns. In environments where low-, medium- and high-frequency returns are accurately available, beta forecasting with low-frequency returns are the least accurate and beta forecasting with high-frequency returns are the most accurate. The improvements in precision of the beta forecasts are demonstrated in portfolio optimization for a targeted beta exposure.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 528–541 |
Journal | Journal of Forecasting |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2016 |