Moral Business: Changing Corporate Behaviour by 'Speaking Their Language'

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution


The academic publisher Reed Elsevier also organised the world???s largest defence exhibitions. The exhibitions themselves have regularly met vibrant street protests, and from 2005 campaigners targeted the corporate organisers. A coordinated network of anti-arms trade activists, academics, medical professionals and institutional shareholders formed a multifaceted campaign that sought to persuade the corporation to change its behaviour on its own terms. After initial intransigence, Reed Elsevier divested itself of its defence sector activities in 2008. On the basis of interviews with activists and corporate employees, this paper addresses two sets of questions about the Elsevier campaign. First, what are the components of a successful, corporate-focused campaign? Insights from the recently expanded literature on the outcomes of social movements will be tested against both facts of this case and the conscious strategy pursued by participants. I will argue that the movement outcomes literature continues to cope better with movements demanding state responses than those directed at corporations. Secondly, therefore, this paper examines a set of broader questions about the character of moral demands placed on corporate activity, and the way in which management discourses of corporate responsibility or citizenship partially constrains the response of relevant decision makers.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationhost publication
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2009
EventEuropean Sociological Association General Conference - Lisbon, Portugal
Duration: 2 Sept 20096 Sept 2009


ConferenceEuropean Sociological Association General Conference
CityLisbon, Portugal


  • corporate campaign
  • arms trade
  • social movements
  • stakeholder network


Dive into the research topics of 'Moral Business: Changing Corporate Behaviour by 'Speaking Their Language''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this