More than Skin Deep: Reconsidering Isolated Remains of ‘Fur-Bearing Species’ in the British and European Mesolithic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Traditional accounts of animals in Mesolithic Northwest Europe have ultimately been economic in character, with a particular focus of the larger ungulate species that formed the dietary mainstay. Smaller mammalian species, regularly grouped as ‘fur-bearing’ species, also play a role in such accounts, as the source of important non-nutritional materials, namely their fur. However, how has placing these species in this broad category impacted archaeology's interpretation of their remains in the Mesolithic? This paper argues economic categorization of these species has led to an automatic interpretation of their remains, which may overlook evidence for other uses and treatments. This research proposes that the remains of ‘fur-bearing’ species were not just waste products from fur extraction, but were also wrapped up in complex and meaningful human-nonhuman relationships, which impacted how these remains were treated, and ultimately shaped the archaeological record.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)561-578
Number of pages17
JournalCambridge Archaeological Journal
Volume26
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 25 Oct 2016

Keywords

  • Mesolithic
  • Human-animal relationships
  • Social Zooarchaeology
  • Archaeology
  • zooarchaeology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'More than Skin Deep: Reconsidering Isolated Remains of ‘Fur-Bearing Species’ in the British and European Mesolithic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this