Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Motivations to Act for the Protection of Nature Biodiversity and the Environment: A Matter of “Significance”

  • Erica Molinario*
  • , Arie W. Kruglanski
  • , Flavia Bonaiuto
  • , Mirilia Bonnes
  • , Lavinia Cicero
  • , Ferdinando Fornara
  • , Massimiliano Scopelliti
  • , Jeroen Admiraal
  • , Almut Beringer
  • , Tom Dedeurwaerdere
  • , Wouter deGroot
  • , Juha Hiedanpää
  • , Paul Knights
  • , Luuk Knippenberg
  • , Chris Ovdenden
  • , Katarina Polajnar Horvat
  • , Florin Popa
  • , Carmen Porras-Gomez
  • , Aleš Smrekar
  • , Nathalie Soethe
  • Jose Luis Vivero-Pol, Riyan J.G. van den Born, Marino Bonaiuto
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Maryland at College Park
  • Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza
  • CIRPA
  • OPRS - Ordine degli Psicologi della Regione Sicilia
  • Universita di Cagliari
  • Libera Universita Maria Ss. Assunta (LUMSA)
  • Institute of Environmental Sciences
  • Leiden University
  • Ernst Moritz Arndt University Greifswald
  • Universite Catholique de Louvain (Catholic University of Louvain)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)
  • Anton Melik Geographical Institute
  • European Commission
  • UMIST

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

599 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Environmental activism, defined as a range of difficult pro-environmental behaviors, is analyzed within the conceptual framework of Significance Quest Theory (SQT). In Study 1, 40 interviews were carried out on two groups of people in the European Union: Committed Actors for Nature (CANs, n = 25) versus Committed Actors for Society (CASs, n = 15). Results demonstrated that Significance Quest (SQ) motivates each group to be strongly committed to their chosen action and the main difference between them being in their ideology (pro-social vs. pro-environmental). In Study 2 (N = 131), the relationship between SQ and intention to enact difficult pro-environmental behaviors was assessed. Results suggested that the higher the SQ, the higher the tendency to enact difficult pro-environmental behaviors, but not average or easy ones. Moreover, the higher the pro-environmental ideology, the stronger the indirect effect of SQ on difficult behavior through willingness to sacrifice.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEnvironment and Behavior
Early online date30 Jan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • difficult pro-environmental behaviors
  • environmental activism
  • meaning in life
  • pro-environmental behaviors
  • pro-environmental ideology
  • willingness to sacrifice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Motivations to Act for the Protection of Nature Biodiversity and the Environment: A Matter of “Significance”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this