TY - JOUR
T1 - Multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy
AU - Miller, Christopher A.
AU - Sarma, Jaydeep
AU - Naish, Josephine H.
AU - Yonan, Nizar
AU - Williams, Simon G.
AU - Shaw, Steven M.
AU - Clark, David
AU - Pearce, Keith
AU - Stout, Martin
AU - Potluri, Rahul
AU - Borg, Alex
AU - Coutts, Glyn
AU - Chowdhary, Saqib
AU - McCann, Gerry P.
AU - Parker, Geoffrey J M
AU - Ray, Simon G.
AU - Schmitt, Matthias
PY - 2014/3/4
Y1 - 2014/3/4
N2 - Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the diagnostic performance of multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) for detecting cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) using contemporary invasive epicardial artery and microvascular assessment techniques as reference standards, and to compare the performance of CMR with that of angiography. Background: CAV continues to limit the long-term survival of heart transplant recipients. Coronary angiography has a Class I recommendation for CAV surveillance and annual or biannual surveillance angiography is performed routinely in most centers. Methods: All transplant recipients referred for surveillance angiography at a single UK center over a 2-year period were prospectively screened for study eligibility. Patients prospectively underwent coronary angiography followed by coronary intravascular ultrasound, fractional flow reserve, and index of microcirculatory resistance. Within 1 month, patients underwent multiparametric CMR, including assessment of regional and global ventricular function, absolute myocardial blood flow quantification, and myocardial tissue characterization. In addition, 10 healthy volunteers underwent CMR. Results: Forty-eight patients were recruited, median 7.1 years (interquartile range: 4.6 to 10.3 years) since transplantation. The CMR myocardial perfusion reserve was the only independent predictor of both epicardial (β = -0.57, p <0.001) and microvascular disease (β = -0.60, p <0.001) on stepwise multivariable regression. The CMR myocardial perfusion reserve significantly outperformed angiography for detecting moderate CAV (area under the curve, 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79 to 1.00] vs. 0.59 [95% CI: 0.42 to 0.77], p = 0.01) and severe CAV (area under the curve, 0.88 [95% CI: 0.78 to 0.98] vs. 0.67 [95% CI: 0.52 to 0.82], p = 0.05). Conclusions: CAV, including epicardial and microvascular components, can be detected more accurately using noninvasive CMR-based absolute myocardial blood flow assessment than with invasive coronary angiography, the current clinical surveillance technique. © 2014 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Published by Elsevier Inc.
AB - Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the diagnostic performance of multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) for detecting cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) using contemporary invasive epicardial artery and microvascular assessment techniques as reference standards, and to compare the performance of CMR with that of angiography. Background: CAV continues to limit the long-term survival of heart transplant recipients. Coronary angiography has a Class I recommendation for CAV surveillance and annual or biannual surveillance angiography is performed routinely in most centers. Methods: All transplant recipients referred for surveillance angiography at a single UK center over a 2-year period were prospectively screened for study eligibility. Patients prospectively underwent coronary angiography followed by coronary intravascular ultrasound, fractional flow reserve, and index of microcirculatory resistance. Within 1 month, patients underwent multiparametric CMR, including assessment of regional and global ventricular function, absolute myocardial blood flow quantification, and myocardial tissue characterization. In addition, 10 healthy volunteers underwent CMR. Results: Forty-eight patients were recruited, median 7.1 years (interquartile range: 4.6 to 10.3 years) since transplantation. The CMR myocardial perfusion reserve was the only independent predictor of both epicardial (β = -0.57, p <0.001) and microvascular disease (β = -0.60, p <0.001) on stepwise multivariable regression. The CMR myocardial perfusion reserve significantly outperformed angiography for detecting moderate CAV (area under the curve, 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79 to 1.00] vs. 0.59 [95% CI: 0.42 to 0.77], p = 0.01) and severe CAV (area under the curve, 0.88 [95% CI: 0.78 to 0.98] vs. 0.67 [95% CI: 0.52 to 0.82], p = 0.05). Conclusions: CAV, including epicardial and microvascular components, can be detected more accurately using noninvasive CMR-based absolute myocardial blood flow assessment than with invasive coronary angiography, the current clinical surveillance technique. © 2014 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Published by Elsevier Inc.
KW - cardiac allograft vasculopathy
KW - cardiovascular magnetic resonance
KW - diagnosis
KW - microvascular disease
KW - myocardial blood flow
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.119
DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.119
M3 - Article
C2 - 24355800
SN - 0735-1097
VL - 63
SP - 799
EP - 808
JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
IS - 8
ER -