TY - JOUR
T1 - National and regional asthma programmes in Europe.
AU - Selroos, Olof
AU - Kupczyk, Maciej
AU - Kuna, Piotr
AU - Łacwik, Piotr
AU - Bousquet, Jean
AU - Brennan, David
AU - Palkonen, Susanna
AU - Contreras, Javier
AU - FitzGerald, Mark
AU - Hedlin, Gunilla
AU - Johnston, Sebastian L
AU - Louis, Renaud
AU - Metcalf, Leanne
AU - Walker, Samantha
AU - Moreno-Galdó, Antonio
AU - Papadopoulos, Nikolaos G
AU - Rosado-Pinto, José
AU - Powell, Pippa
AU - Haahtela, Tari
PY - 2015/9
Y1 - 2015/9
N2 - This review presents seven national asthma programmes to support the European Asthma Research and Innovation Partnership in developing strategies to reduce asthma mortality and morbidity across Europe. From published data it appears that in order to influence asthma care, national/regional asthma programmes are more effective than conventional treatment guidelines. An asthma programme should start with the universal commitments of stakeholders at all levels and the programme has to be endorsed by political and governmental bodies. When the national problems have been identified, the goals of the programme have to be clearly defined with measures to evaluate progress. An action plan has to be developed, including defined re-allocation of patients and existing resources, if necessary, between primary care and specialised healthcare units or hospital centres. Patients should be involved in guided self-management education and structured follow-up in relation to disease severity. The three evaluated programmes show that, thanks to rigorous efforts, it is possible to improve patients' quality of life and reduce hospitalisation, asthma mortality, sick leave and disability pensions. The direct and indirect costs, both for the individual patient and for society, can be significantly reduced. The results can form the basis for development of further programme activities in Europe.
AB - This review presents seven national asthma programmes to support the European Asthma Research and Innovation Partnership in developing strategies to reduce asthma mortality and morbidity across Europe. From published data it appears that in order to influence asthma care, national/regional asthma programmes are more effective than conventional treatment guidelines. An asthma programme should start with the universal commitments of stakeholders at all levels and the programme has to be endorsed by political and governmental bodies. When the national problems have been identified, the goals of the programme have to be clearly defined with measures to evaluate progress. An action plan has to be developed, including defined re-allocation of patients and existing resources, if necessary, between primary care and specialised healthcare units or hospital centres. Patients should be involved in guided self-management education and structured follow-up in relation to disease severity. The three evaluated programmes show that, thanks to rigorous efforts, it is possible to improve patients' quality of life and reduce hospitalisation, asthma mortality, sick leave and disability pensions. The direct and indirect costs, both for the individual patient and for society, can be significantly reduced. The results can form the basis for development of further programme activities in Europe.
U2 - 10.1183/16000617.00008114
DO - 10.1183/16000617.00008114
M3 - Article
C2 - 26324809
SN - 1600-0617
VL - 24
JO - European Respiratory Review
JF - European Respiratory Review
IS - 137
ER -