Abstract
In this editorial we suggest that work and organizational psychology has tended to overlook the insights to be gained from 'alternative' perspectives such as interpretivism, critical theory and postmodernism, in favour of a focus on more normative and positivist studies of organizational life. While paradigmatic conformity is argued by some to have the benefit of providing a coherent knowledge base, we argue that it may also lead to an overly restrictive viewpoint and constrained practices. In any case, such a focus may be partly a default option rather than a conscious choice, fostered by assumptions of what constitutes 'good' research which may not be appropriate to (and even discriminate against) other perspectives. As a consequence, this special section aims to illustrate the insights to be gained from adopting such 'alternative' perspectives on topics of contemporary interest to work and organizational psychologists, such as retention of women in the workforce, collaborative (cross-agency) work, advanced technological change and stress at work. © 2006 The British Psychological Society.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 307-314 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology |
Volume | 79 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2006 |