Abstract
We aimed to investigate whether the outcome and complications of surgical treatment of neuromuscular curves with segmental third-generation instrumentation could compare with those reported with standard second-generation instrumentation. The clinical and radiologic data of a single surgeon's consecutive series of patients with neuromuscular scoliosis treated with two types of newer-generation instrumentation and posterior or anteroposterior approaches were retrospectively and independently reviewed. The results of this study support the concept that third-generation instrumentation is able to provide at least as good results as second-generation instrumentation in the treatment of neuromuscular scoliosis patients, at the expense of a lower complication rate.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 430-8 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Journal of spinal disorders & techniques |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 5 |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2005 |
Keywords
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Child
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Male
- Neuromuscular Diseases/complications
- Orthopedic Fixation Devices
- Patient Satisfaction
- Radiography
- Retrospective Studies
- Scoliosis/diagnostic imaging
- Spinal Fusion/adverse effects
- Treatment Outcome