Abstract
Peter van Inwagen claims that there are no tables or chairs. He also claims that sentences such as 'There are chairs here', which seem to imply their existence, are often true. This combination of views opens van Inwagen to a charge of self-contradiction. I explain the charge, and van Inwagen's response to it, which involves the claim that sentences like 'There are tables' shift their truth-conditions between ordinary and philosophical contexts. I present an alternative response which involves the negation of that claim, and argue that it is preferable to van Inwagen's.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Being: Developments in Contemporary Metaphysics |
Subtitle of host publication | (Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 62) |
Editors | Robin Le Poidevin |
Place of Publication | Cambridge |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Pages | 177-196 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Volume | 83 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2008 |