Abstract
Background Women with breast pain constitute upto 20% of breast clinic attendees.
Aim To investigate breast cancer incidence in women presenting with breast pain and establish health economics of referring women with breast pain to secondary care.
Design & Setting Prospective cohort study of all consecutive women referred to a breast diagnostic clinic over 12 months.
Methods Women were categorised by presentation into 4 distinct clinical groups and cancer incidence investigated.
Results Of 10 830 women, 1972 (18%) were referred with breast pain, 6708 (62%) with lumps, 480 (4%) with nipple symptoms,1670 (15%) with ‘other’ symptoms. Mammography, performed in 1112 women with breast pain, identified cancer in 8 (0.7%). In 1972 women with breast pain, breast cancer incidence was 0.4% compared with ~5% in each of the three other clinical groups. Using ‘breast lump’ as reference, odds ratio (OR) of women referred
with breast pain having breast cancer was 0.05 (95% confidence interval 0.02–0.09; P<0.001). Compared to reassurance in primary-care, referral was more costly (net cost £262) without additional health benefits (net Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) loss -0.012). Greatest impact on the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) was when QALY loss due to referral associated anxiety was excluded. Primary-care reassurance no longer dominated, but the ICER remained greater (£45,528/QALY) than typical UK National Health Service
cost-effectiveness thresholds.
Conclusions This study shows that referring women with breast pain to a breast diagnostic clinic is an inefficient use of limited resources. Alternative management pathways could improve capacity and reduce financial burden.
Aim To investigate breast cancer incidence in women presenting with breast pain and establish health economics of referring women with breast pain to secondary care.
Design & Setting Prospective cohort study of all consecutive women referred to a breast diagnostic clinic over 12 months.
Methods Women were categorised by presentation into 4 distinct clinical groups and cancer incidence investigated.
Results Of 10 830 women, 1972 (18%) were referred with breast pain, 6708 (62%) with lumps, 480 (4%) with nipple symptoms,1670 (15%) with ‘other’ symptoms. Mammography, performed in 1112 women with breast pain, identified cancer in 8 (0.7%). In 1972 women with breast pain, breast cancer incidence was 0.4% compared with ~5% in each of the three other clinical groups. Using ‘breast lump’ as reference, odds ratio (OR) of women referred
with breast pain having breast cancer was 0.05 (95% confidence interval 0.02–0.09; P<0.001). Compared to reassurance in primary-care, referral was more costly (net cost £262) without additional health benefits (net Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) loss -0.012). Greatest impact on the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) was when QALY loss due to referral associated anxiety was excluded. Primary-care reassurance no longer dominated, but the ICER remained greater (£45,528/QALY) than typical UK National Health Service
cost-effectiveness thresholds.
Conclusions This study shows that referring women with breast pain to a breast diagnostic clinic is an inefficient use of limited resources. Alternative management pathways could improve capacity and reduce financial burden.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | British Journal of General Practice |
Publication status | Accepted/In press - 10 Nov 2021 |