Abstract
Rehabilitating an argument originally proposed by Leibniz, Michael Della Rocca has offered a new argument for the Principle of Sufficient Reason. A crucial element of this argument is that, for every x, the fact that x does not brutely fail to exist is an untrivial requisite of x’s existence. Criticising this claim, I show that the new argument for PSR fails.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | The Journal of Philosophy |
Early online date | 26 Jul 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 26 Jul 2024 |