Abstract
Rehabilitating an argument originally proposed by Leibniz, Michael Della Rocca has offered a new argument for the Principle of Sufficient Reason. A crucial element of this argument is that, for every x, the fact that x does not brutely fail to exist is an untrivial requisite of x’s existence. Criticising this claim, I show that the new argument for PSR fails.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | The Journal of Philosophy |
| Early online date | 26 Jul 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 26 Jul 2024 |