Nonverbal indicators of deception: How iconic gestures reveal thoughts that cannot be suppressed

Doron Cohen, Geoffrey Beattie, Heather Shovelton

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This study explores the morphology of iconic gestures during deception. Participants narrated a static cartoon story twice. In one condition they provided an accurate account of the story, in the other they were instructed to introduce false details. Participants produced significantly fewer iconic gestures when describing plot-line events deceptively than when narrating comparable episode units truthfully. Deceptive gestures had significantly fewer post-stroke holds and shorter stroke phase durations than those produced alongside truthful utterances. Following Beattie (2003) three narrators in the deceptive condition produced gestures that in their morphology contradicted the semantic information encoded in their speech stream, and ultimately signaled possible deceit. © Walter de Gruyter.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)133-174
    Number of pages41
    JournalSemiotica
    Volume2010
    Issue number182
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2010

    Keywords

    • Contradictory gestures
    • Deception
    • Gesture frequency
    • Gesture-speech mismatches
    • Iconic gestures
    • Nonverbal leakage

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Nonverbal indicators of deception: How iconic gestures reveal thoughts that cannot be suppressed'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this