Occupational asthma: An assessment of diagnostic agreement between physicians

David Fishwick, Lisa Bradshaw, Mandy Henson, Chris Stenton, David Hendrick, Sherwood Burge, Rob Niven, Chris Warburton, Trevor Rogers, Roger Rawbone, Paul Cullinan, Chris Barber, Tony Pickering, Nerys Williams, Jon Ayres, Andrew D. Curran

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    Objectives: To investigate the levels of agreement between expert respiratory physicians when making a diagnosis of occupational asthma. Methods: 19 cases of possible occupational asthma were identified as part of a larger national observational cohort. A case summary for each case was then circulated to 12 physicians, asking for a percentage likelihood, from the supplied information, that this case represented occupational asthma. The resulting probabilities were then compared between physicians using Spearman's rank correlation and Cohen's K coefficients. Results: Agreement between the 12 physicians for all 19 cases was generally good as assessed by Spearman's rank correlation. For all 66 physician-physician interactions, 45 were found to correlate significantly at the 5% level. The agreement assessed by K analysis was more variable, with a median κ value of 0.26, (range -0.2 to +0.76), although 7 of the physicians agreed significantly (p
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)185-190
    Number of pages5
    JournalOccupational and Environmental Medicine
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2007


    Dive into the research topics of 'Occupational asthma: An assessment of diagnostic agreement between physicians'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this