OMERACT consensus-based operational definition of contextual factors in rheumatology clinical trials: A mixed methods study

Sabrina Mai Nielsen, Maarten Boers, Maarten De Wit, Beverly Shea, Danielle A. Van Der Windt, Barnaby C. Reeves, Dorcas Beaton, Rieke Alten, Karine Toupin April, Annelies Boonen, Reuben Escorpizo, Caroline Flurey, Daniel E. Furst, Francis Guillemin, Amye Leong, Christoph Pohl, Marianne Uggen Rasmussen, Jasvinder A. Singh, Josef S. Smolen, Vibeke StrandSuzanne M.m. Verstappen, Marieke Voshaar, Thasia G. Woodworth, Torkell Ellingsen, Lyn March, George A. Wells, Peter Tugwell, Robin Christensen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives
To develop an operational definition of contextual factors (CF) [1].

Methods
Based on previously conducted interviews, we presented three CF types in a Delphi survey; Effect Modifying -, Outcome Influencing - and Measurement Affecting CFs. Subsequently, a virtual Special Interest Group (SIG) session was held for in depth discussion of Effect Modifying CFs.

Results
Of 161 Delphi participants, 129 (80%) completed both rounds. After two rounds, we reached consensus (≥70% agreeing) for all but two statements. The 45 SIG participants were broadly supportive.

Conclusion
Through consensus we developed an operational definition of CFs, which was well received by OMERACT members.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSeminars in arthritis and rheumatism
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Apr 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'OMERACT consensus-based operational definition of contextual factors in rheumatology clinical trials: A mixed methods study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this