On the flexibility of WS-agreement for job submission

Rizos Sakellariou; Viktor Yarmolenko

doi:10.1145/1101499.1101511

On the flexibility of WS-agreement for job submission

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

This paper considers extensions to the WS-Agreement specification, namely the Guarantee Terms of WS-Agreement [1]. Experiences and conclusions drawn are in the context of Agreement-based job management systems. A key idea of these extensions is the use of functions for the Guarantee Terms of the Agreement rather than constant values or ranges. Functions may contain variables defined in a particular agreement or be drawn from the known set of reference variables, such as wall-clock time, job start time, etc. We show that such an approach can potentially reduce the negotiation overheads associated with job renegotiation and/or reduce the number of failed agreements. Copyright 2005 ACM.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	ACM International Conference Proceeding Series\|ACM Int. Conf. Proc. Ser.
Volume	117
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1145/1101499.1101511
Publication status	Published - 2005
Event	3rd International Workshop on Middleware for Grid Computing, MGC'05, Held at the ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Middleware Conference - Grenoble Duration: 1 Jul 2005 → …

Conference

Conference	3rd International Workshop on Middleware for Grid Computing, MGC'05, Held at the ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Middleware Conference
City	Grenoble
Period	1/07/05 → …

Keywords

job submission
service level agreement
WS-agreement

Access to Document

10.1145/1101499.1101511

Cite this

@inproceedings{7911c16e51d34753b23c5c25c167571f,

title = "On the flexibility of WS-agreement for job submission",

abstract = "This paper considers extensions to the WS-Agreement specification, namely the Guarantee Terms of WS-Agreement [1]. Experiences and conclusions drawn are in the context of Agreement-based job management systems. A key idea of these extensions is the use of functions for the Guarantee Terms of the Agreement rather than constant values or ranges. Functions may contain variables defined in a particular agreement or be drawn from the known set of reference variables, such as wall-clock time, job start time, etc. We show that such an approach can potentially reduce the negotiation overheads associated with job renegotiation and/or reduce the number of failed agreements. Copyright 2005 ACM.",

keywords = "job submission, service level agreement, WS-agreement",

author = "Rizos Sakellariou and Viktor Yarmolenko",

note = "ISBN 1-59593-269-013 cites: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=424965240508708323; 3rd International Workshop on Middleware for Grid Computing, MGC'05, Held at the ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Middleware Conference ; Conference date: 01-07-2005",

year = "2005",

doi = "10.1145/1101499.1101511",

language = "English",

isbn = "1595932690",

volume = "117",

booktitle = "ACM International Conference Proceeding Series|ACM Int. Conf. Proc. Ser.",

}

Sakellariou, R & Yarmolenko, V 2005, On the flexibility of WS-agreement for job submission. in ACM International Conference Proceeding Series|ACM Int. Conf. Proc. Ser.. vol. 117, 3rd International Workshop on Middleware for Grid Computing, MGC'05, Held at the ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Middleware Conference, Grenoble, 1/07/05. https://doi.org/10.1145/1101499.1101511

TY - GEN

T1 - On the flexibility of WS-agreement for job submission

AU - Sakellariou, Rizos

AU - Yarmolenko, Viktor

N1 - ISBN 1-59593-269-013 cites: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=424965240508708323

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - This paper considers extensions to the WS-Agreement specification, namely the Guarantee Terms of WS-Agreement [1]. Experiences and conclusions drawn are in the context of Agreement-based job management systems. A key idea of these extensions is the use of functions for the Guarantee Terms of the Agreement rather than constant values or ranges. Functions may contain variables defined in a particular agreement or be drawn from the known set of reference variables, such as wall-clock time, job start time, etc. We show that such an approach can potentially reduce the negotiation overheads associated with job renegotiation and/or reduce the number of failed agreements. Copyright 2005 ACM.

AB - This paper considers extensions to the WS-Agreement specification, namely the Guarantee Terms of WS-Agreement [1]. Experiences and conclusions drawn are in the context of Agreement-based job management systems. A key idea of these extensions is the use of functions for the Guarantee Terms of the Agreement rather than constant values or ranges. Functions may contain variables defined in a particular agreement or be drawn from the known set of reference variables, such as wall-clock time, job start time, etc. We show that such an approach can potentially reduce the negotiation overheads associated with job renegotiation and/or reduce the number of failed agreements. Copyright 2005 ACM.

KW - job submission

KW - service level agreement

KW - WS-agreement

U2 - 10.1145/1101499.1101511

DO - 10.1145/1101499.1101511

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 1595932690

SN - 9781595932693

VL - 117

BT - ACM International Conference Proceeding Series|ACM Int. Conf. Proc. Ser.

T2 - 3rd International Workshop on Middleware for Grid Computing, MGC'05, Held at the ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Middleware Conference

Y2 - 1 July 2005

ER -

On the flexibility of WS-agreement for job submission

Abstract

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this