Abstract
This paper responds to Professor Morishima's defence of the interpretation of Ricardo advanced in his Ricardo's Economics (1989) and reiterated in his 'Morishima on Ricardo: two replies' (this journal, 1996). It is argued that key features of Morishima's interpretation are unsustainable.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 221-226 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Cambridge Journal of Economics |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 1998 |