Opiate and sedative dependence predicts a poor outcome for patients receiving home parenteral nutrition

D M Richards, N A Scott, J L Shaffer, M Irving

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is used to treat intestinal failure. A minority of HPN patients are dependent on opiates and benzodiazepines to control pain and anxiety. The aim of this study was to determine what effects such drug dependence had on patient outcomes.

METHODS: Ten dependent patients were prospectively compared with 10 well-matched, nondependent HPN patients for the same 12-month period. Episodes of line sepsis and other complications were documented and the cost of treatment estimated. Health status was measured using the SF36 and EuroQol instruments.

RESULTS: The dependent group had significantly more episodes of central line sepsis (p = .0007) as well as other complications (p = .0002). This led to significantly longer periods of inpatient care (p = .0004) and therefore higher costs of treatment. Health status was lower in the dependent group; they reported more pain (p = .04) and less energy (p = .04).

CONCLUSIONS: The complication rate and increased cost of treatment for opiate- and sedative-dependent patients receiving HPN significantly detract from the overall outcome of this therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)336-8
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of parenteral and enteral nutrition
Volume21
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 24 Dec 1997

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Anti-Anxiety Agents
  • Benzodiazepines
  • Female
  • Health Status
  • Humans
  • Intestinal Diseases
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Narcotics
  • Opioid-Related Disorders
  • Parenteral Nutrition, Home
  • Prospective Studies
  • Quality of Life
  • Substance-Related Disorders
  • Time Factors
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Opiate and sedative dependence predicts a poor outcome for patients receiving home parenteral nutrition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this