Abstract
Wearable devices have the potential to improve healthcare, but suffer from significant barriers to adoption, including the need for constant recharging. Harvesting energy from the ambient environment to top-up batteries can overcome this, but the actual energy available is very small, and hence it is critical that the whole system is highly optimized. This paper presents an investigation into the optimization of inertial energy harvesters for placement at the human foot. Lower body locations have previously been shown to be very energy dense, however previous energy harvester modeling has focused on the
lower leg rather than the foot itself for ease of device placement. We show that the typical energy density can be almost double at the foot compared with lower leg positions, with substantially more energy concentrated in a smaller bandwidth. There is thus a dual benefit of placing a harvester at the foot: there
is more energy due to the larger movement of the foot, and more efficient (higher Q) harvesters can be used to increase the collected energy. We place these results in context by analyzing the power demands of a typical wearable, and identify that with appropriate harvester tuning the peak current requirements of the electronics can be fitted into the energy peaks generated
from each footstep.
lower leg rather than the foot itself for ease of device placement. We show that the typical energy density can be almost double at the foot compared with lower leg positions, with substantially more energy concentrated in a smaller bandwidth. There is thus a dual benefit of placing a harvester at the foot: there
is more energy due to the larger movement of the foot, and more efficient (higher Q) harvesters can be used to increase the collected energy. We place these results in context by analyzing the power demands of a typical wearable, and identify that with appropriate harvester tuning the peak current requirements of the electronics can be fitted into the energy peaks generated
from each footstep.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | IEEE EMBC |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 29 Oct 2018 |
Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms
- Manchester Institute for Collaborative Research on Ageing