Oral tolerance to contact allergens: A common occurrence? A review

Jonathan M L White, Anthony T J Goon, Ian R. Jowsey, David A. Basketter, Rose K H Mak, Ian Kimber, John P. McFadden

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Experimental and clinical oral tolerance to contact allergens has been reported sporadically, most notably in respect of nickel, and is generally assumed to be an uncommon phenomenon. There has recently been increased understanding of the immunological mechanisms inducing and maintaining oral tolerance. There are several contact allergens, including fragrance, antioxidant, and preservative chemicals, to which subjects are exposed through both cutaneous and oral routes. We examine the possibility that oral tolerance to contact allergens may be more common than previously thought. Animal models of oral tolerance to contact allergens indicate that cutaneous exposure to small, subsensitizing doses of contact allergens might negate any subsequent attempts to induce tolerance by oral administration. Extrapolating these observations to common human practises raises the possibility that application of contact allergens (fragrances, preservatives and antioxidants) in consumer products used by children could prevent or inhibit the later acquisition of specific tolerance resulting from 'natural' dietary exposure after weaning. Existing data on formaldehyde may conflict with this theory, though this could be explained by allergen specificity. We propose that further work in this area is needed. © 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)247-254
    Number of pages7
    JournalContact dermatitis
    Volume56
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2007

    Keywords

    • Epicutaneous tolerance
    • Gut
    • Oral tolerance
    • Regulatory T cells
    • Sensitization

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Oral tolerance to contact allergens: A common occurrence? A review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this