Outcomes for depression and anxiety in primary care and details of treatment: a naturalistic longitudinal study.

Marijn A Prins, Peter F M Verhaak, Mirrian Hilbink-Smolders, Peter Spreeuwenberg, Miranda G H Laurant, Klaas {Van Der Meer}, Harm Van Marwijk, Brenda W J H Penninx, Jozien M Bensing

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    There is little evidence as to whether or not guideline concordant care in general practice results in better clinical outcomes for people with anxiety and depression. This study aims to determine possible associations between guideline concordant care and clinical outcomes in general practice patients with depression and anxiety, and identify patient and treatment characteristics associated with clinical improvement.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalBMC Psychiatry
    Volume11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Keywords

    • adult
    • anxiety disorders
    • anxiety disorders therapy
    • depressive disorder
    • depressive disorder therapy
    • female
    • guideline adherence
    • humans
    • longitudinal studies
    • male
    • middle aged
    • netherlands
    • practice guidelines topic
    • primary health care
    • primary health care standards
    • questionnaires
    • treatment outcome

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes for depression and anxiety in primary care and details of treatment: a naturalistic longitudinal study.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this