Paraspinal muscle EMG fatigue testing with two methods in healthy volunteers. Reliability in the context of clinical applications

G. A. Koumantakis, F. Arnall, R. G. Cooper, J. A. Oldham

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Objective. Comparison of the accuracy of surface electromyogram for back muscle endurance assessment with two different tests.Design. Test-retest measurements in 16 healthy volunteers on two separate occasions for each test under controlled conditions. Background. Back muscle endurance is considered important in low back pain rehabilitation. Reliability of paraspinal muscle endurance assessment is a pre-requisite for accurate and meaningful clinical applications of the technique. Methods. All participants performed each test twice. A direct comparison was made between two popular fatigue testing methods, the modified Biering-Sørensen and a 60% maximum voluntary isometric contraction in the upright position during which time fatigue was assessed from the electromyogram spectral and amplitude analysis. Results. Reproducibility of initial median frequency was excellent for both tests. Normalised median frequency slope values were more reliable with the 60% maximum voluntary contraction upright test. The clinical applicability of these measures in detecting significant differences after patient rehabilitation is recommended. Root mean square had very large between-day error for both tests. Relevance - This paper provides information on the accuracy level of power spectral analysis for use as an endurance outcome measure in back muscle rehabilitation studies. Copyright © 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)263-266
    Number of pages3
    JournalClinical Biomechanics
    Volume16
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2001

    Keywords

    • EMG
    • Low back
    • Power spectral analysis
    • Reliability

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Paraspinal muscle EMG fatigue testing with two methods in healthy volunteers. Reliability in the context of clinical applications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this